linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (nct6775) update ASUS WMI monitoring list A520/B360/B460/B550...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:35:19 +0200
From:   Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     jdelvare@...e.com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mischief@...blast.org,
        de99like@...nucci.debian.net, holger.kiehl@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (nct6775) update ASUS WMI monitoring list
 A520/B360/B460/B550...

On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:17:49 +0200
Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:04:53 +0200
> Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:58:24 -0700
> > Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >   
> > > On 3/15/23 14:30, Denis Pauk wrote:    
> > > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:01:35 +0200
> > > > Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Tested-by: Holger Kiehl <holger.kiehl@....de>
> > > > 
> > > > Pro A520M-C II/CSM is also tested by Holger Kiehl
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/868bdc4f-9d45-475c-963e-f5232a8b95@praktifix.dwd.de/
> > > > 
> > > > Could it be applied as single patch or need to rebase over "Pro A520M-C
> > > > II" patch?
> > > >       
> > > Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I just applied all
> > > patches in sequence as received, with no conflicts. Should I undo that ?
> > > 
> > > Guenter
> > >     
> > 
> > No, Thank you!
> > 
> > I just like to mention that Holger Kiehl sent separate patch with
> > "Pro A520M-C II" support and it could create conflicts. I have found it only
> > when I have sent my patches.
> >   
> 
> I have rechecked repo and "Pro A520M-C II" is added twice after apply both of
> patches (my and from Holger Kiehl), could you please remove one of mention of
> it?

I have resent updated version of this patch without duplication of adding "Pro
A520M-C II", 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/20230315222702.1803-1-pauk.denis@gmail.com/

you could revert this patch and add apply new one, or fix this one. 

Thank you!

Best regards,
      	Denis.