[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16cc37a4-0d97-9881-9a30-a3a3efa2c244@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:26:51 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property
presence
On 3/10/23 23:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Applied to for-6.4. Thanks !
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists