linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] usb: Add support for Intel LJCA device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZBGLYXxpkwokgV4R@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:09:53 +0200
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Ye, Xiang" <xiang.ye@...el.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Tyrone Ting <kfting@...oton.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
        zhifeng.wang@...el.com, wentong.wu@...el.com, lixu.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] usb: Add support for Intel LJCA device

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 05:52:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:38:14PM +0800, Ye, Xiang wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:36:57AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 04:03:26PM +0800, Ye, Xiang wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > You don't really seem to get any benefit from MFD. Perhaps it would be
> > > more appropriate and clear if you just registered auxiliary devices in
> > > this driver. Check drivers/base/auxiliary.c.
> > Yes, it should be a work. I have a question.
> > MFD provides the ACPI binding for sub-devices through
> > struct mfd_cell_acpi_match. But I didn't see this in drivers/base/auxiliary.c.
> > If using auxiliary bus to implement the LJCA sub-devices, we need to do
> > the sub-devices acpi binding manually in ljca.c.
> > 
> > Something Like:
> > adr = LJCA_ACPI_MATCH_GPIO
> > adev = acpi_find_child_device(parent, adr, false);
> > ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&pdev->dev, adev ?: parent);
> > 
> > Is that acceptable?

Looks ok to me.

> Maybe you can implement this on the level of auxiliary bus.

I would actually prefer that the auxiliary bus itself does not make
any assumptions regarding the whereabouts of the fwnodes at this
stage. Maybe later, when(if) there are more users.

thanks,

-- 
heikki