[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mdsnvrh1NtKoSHwG-5NETGqjiZytPOJ-45YJvya1k0Ngg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:48:16 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Remove duplicative check in gpiod_find_and_request()
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 7:56 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> The gpiod_find_by_fwnode() already checks for NULL and returns
> correct error code in case fwnode is invalid. Drop the respective
> check and assignment in the gpiod_find_and_request().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 8ecfe3afde1e..333ccd44e2b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -3927,13 +3927,10 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer,
> bool platform_lookup_allowed)
> {
> unsigned long lookupflags = GPIO_LOOKUP_FLAGS_DEFAULT;
> - struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> + struct gpio_desc *desc;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> - desc = gpiod_find_by_fwnode(fwnode, consumer, con_id, idx,
> - &flags, &lookupflags);
> -
> + desc = gpiod_find_by_fwnode(fwnode, consumer, con_id, idx, &flags, &lookupflags);
> if (gpiod_not_found(desc) && platform_lookup_allowed) {
> /*
> * Either we are not using DT or ACPI, or their lookup did not
> --
> 2.39.1
>
Applied, thanks!
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists