lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-9bf3f6be-12f9-466e-90b8-50f2d96971fe@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 19:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC:     jiaxun.yang@...goat.com, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        robin.murphy@....com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: Select ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:20:27 PST (-0800), Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:36:43AM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>> For riscv our assumption is unless a device states it is non-coherent,
>> we take it to be DMA coherent.
>> 
>> Select ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT to ensure dma_default_coherent
>> is always initialized to true.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> index 1d46a268ce16..b71ce992c0c0 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
>>  
>>  config RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
>>  	bool
>> +	select ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT
>
> Since we are always coherent by default, I feel like you should put this
> in the main "config RISCV" section, where OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT
> currently is, no?

Seems reasonable to me.  With that

Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>

as I'm assuming these should all stay together.

Thanks!

>
> Wouldn't bother respinning for that unless the dma folk have comments
> for you.
>
>>  	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_PREP_COHERENT
>>  	select ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
>>  	select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU
>> -- 
>> 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
>> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ