[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230315131043.GA1927891@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 22:10:43 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com,
fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mpage] 7d28631786: fio.write_iops 27.8%
improvement
On (23/03/15 08:58), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> I think this simply accounts for the I/Os now that were skipped
> when using the bdev_read/write path before.
Oh, that would explain it. Otherwise I was slightly surprised (in a good
way) and puzzled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists