[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBNF5YY/a3msg78k@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 22:07:57 +0530
From: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: octeon: Fix line ending with '('
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:24:42AM -0700, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:45:13PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 08:52:02AM -0700, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> > > Adhere to coding-style.
> >
> > Hi Sumitra,
> > Quick background: Linux Kernel coding style required developers to limit the
> > code within 80 columns per line. This resulted in splitting the long lines into
> > more than one lines. Some splits were unwillingly poor causing checkpatch error
> > [e.g. this one that you are attempting to address].
> > Recently, the 80 column limit was relaxed to 100 columns. This now will allow to
> > merge some poorly split lines resulting in improved readability and avoid
> > checkpath complaints.
> >
> Hi Deepak
>
> Since, you mentioned that the 80 column limit has been relaxed to 100
> columns. So will then this patch be useful??
Yes, that change from 80 to 100 makes way for your patch.
Also always do a "reply-all". You can add more recipients to the email if
necessary, but you should not remove anyone.
>
> > Now, can you use this information to convert your live above a little more
> > descriptive. Remember a well written "why" explanation is almost always
> > necessary.
>
> Okay!
>
> >
> > >
> > > Checkpatch has reported code style warning:
> > > CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('.
> > >
> > > Enhance the design of a function header:
> > > Align the function parameters immediately after '(' in a single line.
> >
> > This is the "what" part and not so useful for such a simple change. You need not
> > write this. However for complex changes or tricky code optimization, the "what"
> > part will be very useful as well.
> >
>
> I will keep this in mind.
>
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > Deepak.
> >
> > >
>
> Regards
>
> SUmitra
> > > Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v2: Change patch subject and description.
> > >
> > > drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h | 4 +---
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h b/drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h
> > > index 7a02e59e283f..3e7b92cd2e35 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h
> > > @@ -1372,9 +1372,7 @@ static inline void cvmx_fau_async_fetch_and_add32(uint64_t scraddr,
> > > int32_t value)
> > > { }
> > >
> > > -static inline union cvmx_gmxx_rxx_rx_inbnd cvmx_spi4000_check_speed(
> > > - int interface,
> > > - int port)
> > > +static inline union cvmx_gmxx_rxx_rx_inbnd cvmx_spi4000_check_speed(int interface, int port)
> > > {
> > > union cvmx_gmxx_rxx_rx_inbnd r;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists