[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBNYogVe9spBmTm2@pc636>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 18:57:54 +0100
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...y.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@...il.com>,
Ariel Levkovich <lariel@...dia.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] tracing: Rename kvfree_rcu() to
kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 06:36:48PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:45:21 +0100
> Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > The kvfree_rcu()'s single argument name is deprecated therefore
> > > rename it to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() variant. The goal is explicitly
> > > underline that it is for sleepable contexts.
> > >
> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
> > >
> > Could you please add you reviwed-by or Acked-by tags so we can bring
> > our series with renaming for the next merge window?
>
> I don't know. Perhaps we should just apply this patch and not worry about
> sleeping and whatnot.
>
> -- Steve
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> index 04f0fdae19a1..5de945a8f61d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static unsigned long osnoise_options = OSN_DEFAULT_OPTIONS;
> struct osnoise_instance {
> struct list_head list;
> struct trace_array *tr;
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> static struct list_head osnoise_instances;
> @@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ static void osnoise_unregister_instance(struct trace_array *tr)
> if (!found)
> return;
>
> - kvfree_rcu(inst);
> + kvfree_rcu(inst, rcu);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> index 20d0c4a97633..ef5fafb40c76 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ int trace_probe_remove_file(struct trace_probe *tp,
> return -ENOENT;
>
> list_del_rcu(&link->list);
> - kvfree_rcu(link);
> + kvfree_rcu(link, rcu);
>
> if (list_empty(&tp->event->files))
> trace_probe_clear_flag(tp, TP_FLAG_TRACE);
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> index ef8ed3b65d05..e6037752dcf0 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ struct trace_probe {
> struct event_file_link {
> struct trace_event_file *file;
> struct list_head list;
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> static inline bool trace_probe_test_flag(struct trace_probe *tp,
>
Anyway i do not see any problems with it
Acked-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
--
Uladzislau Rezki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists