lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACO55ttHaRCe7zZM1YWm_0EKRmy5YSDyP=Edy=VRbeU-gf-iMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 21:04:28 +0100
From:   Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: stop spamming info in quirk_nvidia_hda

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 8:57 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 03:31:22PM +0100, Karol Herbst wrote:
> > Users kept complaining about those messages and it's a little spammy on
> > prime systems so turn it into a debug print.
>
> What is a "prime system"?
>

Laptops with a iGPU + Nvidia Setup. That tech is usually marketed as
"Nvidia Optimus" and people in the open source world made "prime" out
of that, mostly in the context of "prime offloading".

> I'm a little surprised that users would really care about the message.
> But I do see comments like these:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1836308/comments/15
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2002206
> that suggest the message happens frequently, maybe if we're resuming
> the controller after runtime suspend?
>

Yes, that happens every time the discrete Nvidia GPU gets runtime resumed.

> Maybe this should be a pci_info_once() sort of thing?  I think there's
> some value in knowing that we're changing the BIOS configuration
> outside the purview of a driver, since I assume BIOS had some reason
> for hiding the HDA controller.
>

fair point. Most of the bugs happen on the first runtime resume
already, so if that one is good, it's unlikely the system will hit a
bug later on.

> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
> > Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > Fixes: b516ea586d71 ("PCI: Enable NVIDIA HDA controllers")
> > Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/quirks.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > index 44cab813bf951..b10c77bbe4716 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > @@ -5549,7 +5549,7 @@ static void quirk_nvidia_hda(struct pci_dev *gpu)
> >       if (val & BIT(25))
> >               return;
> >
> > -     pci_info(gpu, "Enabling HDA controller\n");
> > +     pci_dbg(gpu, "Enabling HDA controller\n");
> >       pci_write_config_dword(gpu, 0x488, val | BIT(25));
> >
> >       /* The GPU becomes a multi-function device when the HDA is enabled */
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ