[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBOsyBu68d4vh6yU@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:56:56 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pmladek@...e.com, petr.pavlu@...e.com, prarit@...hat.com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, song@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/12] module: avoid userspace pressure on unwanted
allocations
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 04:55:31PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 05:41:53PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > I expect to have a machine (with a crazy number of CPUs/devices) available
> > in a couple of days (1-2), so no need to rush.
> >
> > The original machine I was able to reproduce with is blocked for a little
> > bit longer; so I hope the alternative I looked up will similarly trigger the
> > issue easily.
>
> OK give this a spin:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git/log/?h=20230316-module-alloc-opts
>
> I'm seeing about ~86 MiB saving on the upper bound on memory usage
> while hammering on kmod test 0008, and this is on a small system.
>
> Probably won't help *that* much but am curious... if it helps somewhat.
How much cpu count BTW?
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists