[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r0tpmjoz.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:58:04 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"ye.xingchen@....com.cn" <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dtsen@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: p10-aes-gcm - remove duplicate include header
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 09:44:52PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>
>> Hmm. Seems none of them were ever Cc'ed to linuxppc-dev. So this is the
>> first I've seen of them.
>
> Sorry, I didn't know that you weren't aware of this change. I
> will be more careful with these ppc patches in future.
No worries, not your fault. My comments were mostly intended for Danny.
Although one question I do have for you is what rules, if any, do we
have for deciding whether crypto code goes in drivers/crypto vs
arch/*/crypto?
On powerpc we have some in arch/powerpc/crypto and some in
drivers/crypto/vmx, and I don't really know why it's split that way.
It seems like drivers/crypto is where non-CPU crypto accelerator drivers
go, but then it also has lots of in-CPU crypto code as well AFAICS.
I wonder if we should move drivers/crypto/vmx into arch/powerpc/crypto,
so that all the powerpc CRYPTOGAMS code is in one place. That would help
to clean up some of the duplication of perl scripts we now have.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists