linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] selftests/resctrl: Correct get_llc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50d0e974-478f-ea60-9b7b-50982697ef96@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:04:10 -0700
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] selftests/resctrl: Correct get_llc_perf() param in
 function comment

Hi Ilpo,

On 2/15/2023 5:06 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> get_llc_perf() function comment refers to cpu_no parameter that does
> not exist.
> 
> Correct get_llc_perf() the comment to document llc_perf_miss instead.

"Correct the get_llc_perf() comment"? This is so minor and I do not think
a reason to resubmit whole series.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---

Thank you

Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>

Reinette