[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230315202133.7cb1a0fe@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 20:21:33 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@...il.com>,
Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [BUG 6.3-rc1] Bad lock in ttm_bo_delayed_delete()
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:20:11 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 20:51:49 +0100
> Christian König <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>
> > Steven please try the attached patch.
>
> I applied it, but as it's not always reproducible, I'll have to give it
> several runs before I give you my "tested-by" tag.
I ran my tests a bunch of times with this applied and it didn't fail once.
As it got further than it ever did before (it usually took 1 to 3 runs to
trigger, and I ran it over 10 times).
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Thanks!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists