[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b98945f0-09ef-158a-9348-e518469ec7e3@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:07:31 +0100
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Fix kvm/queue breakage on clang
Am 15/03/2023 um 20:11 schrieb Sean Christopherson:
> Fix clang build errors for patches sitting kvm/queue. Ideally, these
> fixes will be squashed before the buggy commits make their way to kvm/next.
> If you do fixup kvm/queue, the VMX commit also has a bad SOB chain; Jim
> either needs to be listed as the author or his SOB needs to be deleted.
>
> Sean Christopherson (2):
> KVM: VMX: Drop unprotected-by-braces variable declaration in
> case-statement
> KVM: SVM: Drop unprotected-by-braces variable declaration in
> case-statement
>
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 5 ++---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 95b9779c1758f03cf494e8550d6249a40089ed1c
Note to self: compile patches also with clang, since gcc didn't complain
about missing brackets in a switch case.
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists