[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bf5bddd-515b-76b6-f22f-9da10a140d83@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:59:53 -0700
From: Elson Serrao <quic_eserrao@...cinc.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"quic_wcheng@...cinc.com" <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
"quic_jackp@...cinc.com" <quic_jackp@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/6] usb: gadget: f_ecm: Add suspend/resume and remote
wakeup support
On 3/16/2023 5:11 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, Elson Roy Serrao wrote:
>> When host sends a suspend notification to the device, handle
>> the suspend callbacks in the function driver. Enhanced super
>> speed devices can support function suspend feature to put the
>> function in suspend state. Handle function suspend callback.
>>
>> Depending on the remote wakeup capability the device can either
>> trigger a remote wakeup or wait for the host initiated resume to
>> start data transfer again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Elson Roy Serrao <quic_eserrao@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.h | 4 ++
>> 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
>> index a7ab30e..c43cd557 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
>> @@ -633,6 +633,8 @@ static void ecm_disable(struct usb_function *f)
>>
>> usb_ep_disable(ecm->notify);
>> ecm->notify->desc = NULL;
>> + f->func_suspended = false;
>> + f->func_wakeup_armed = false;
>> }
>>
>> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>> @@ -885,6 +887,71 @@ static struct usb_function_instance *ecm_alloc_inst(void)
>> return &opts->func_inst;
>> }
>>
>> +static void ecm_suspend(struct usb_function *f)
>> +{
>> + struct f_ecm *ecm = func_to_ecm(f);
>> + struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = ecm->port.func.config->cdev;
>> +
>> + if (f->func_suspended) {
>> + DBG(cdev, "Function already suspended\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + DBG(cdev, "ECM Suspend\n");
>> +
>> + gether_suspend(&ecm->port);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ecm_resume(struct usb_function *f)
>> +{
>> + struct f_ecm *ecm = func_to_ecm(f);
>> + struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = ecm->port.func.config->cdev;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the function is in USB3 Function Suspend state, resume is
>> + * canceled. In this case resume is done by a Function Resume request.
>> + */
>> + if (f->func_suspended)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + DBG(cdev, "ECM Resume\n");
>> +
>> + gether_resume(&ecm->port);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ecm_get_status(struct usb_function *f)
>> +{
>> + struct usb_configuration *c = f->config;
>> +
>> + /* D0 and D1 bit set to 0 if device is not wakeup capable */
>> + if (!(USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP & c->bmAttributes))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return (f->func_wakeup_armed ? USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW : 0) |
>> + USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW_CAP;
>> +}
>
> Why do we need to implement ecm_get_status if it's already handled in
> composite.c now?
>
Yes this can be removed now. Will modify accordingly.
>> +
>> +static int ecm_func_suspend(struct usb_function *f, u8 options)
>> +{
>> + struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = f->config->cdev;
>> +
>> + DBG(cdev, "func susp %u cmd\n", options);
>> +
>> + if (options & (USB_INTRF_FUNC_SUSPEND_LP >> 8)) {
>
> This feature selector doesn't indicate whether it's SetFeature or
> ClearFeature request. ecm_func_suspend is supposed to be for
> SetFeature(suspend) only. Perhaps we may have to define func_resume()
> for ClearFeature(suspend)?
>
> Thanks,
> Thinh
>
Host uses the same feature selector FUNCTION_SUSPEND for function
suspend and function resume and func_suspend() callback can be used to
handle both the cases ? The distinction comes whether it is a
SetFeature(FUNCTION_SUSPEND) or ClearFeature(FUNCTION_SUSPEND) which can
be easily done in the func_suspend callback itself. We can add another
callback func_resume specific to ClearFeature(FUNCTION_SUSPEND) but wont
that be redundant and more callback handling on function
driver/composite side as well? Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks
Elson
>> + if (!f->func_suspended) {
>> + ecm_suspend(f);
>> + f->func_suspended = true;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + if (f->func_suspended) {
>> + f->func_suspended = false;
>> + ecm_resume(f);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists