[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <IA1PR11MB61715366801048471236AB4289BD9@IA1PR11MB6171.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 03:29:02 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
CC: "paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"rcu@...r.kernel.org" <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] rcu/rcuscale: Stop kfree_scale_thread thread(s) after
unloading rcuscale
> From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> [...]
> > I'm OK with creating a new kernel module for these kfree stuffs, but
> > do we really need to do that?
>
> If it were me doing this, I would try to split it just because in the long term I
> may have to maintain or deal with it.
>
> I was also thinking a new scale directory _may_ make sense for performance
> tests.
>
> kernel/rcu/scaletests/kfree.c
> kernel/rcu/scaletests/core.c
> kernel/rcu/scaletests/ref.c
This looks like really a good constructive suggestion.
But today, please give me a break. ;-).
Thanks!
-Qiuxu
> Or something like that.
>
> and then maybe putt common code into: kernel/rcu/scaletests/common.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists