[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d05ae776-ee19-2ce0-c06b-9825e5cbea82@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:53:07 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>, valentina.manea.m@...il.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hackerzheng666@...il.com,
1395428693sheep@...il.com, alex000young@...il.com,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usbip: vudc: Fix use after free bug in vudc_remove due
to race condition
On 3/17/23 04:09, Zheng Wang wrote:
> In vudc_probe, it calls init_vudc_hw, which bound &udc->timer with v_timer.
>
> When it calls usbip_sockfd_store, it will call v_start_timer to start the
> timer work.
>
> When we call vudc_remove to remove the driver, theremay be a sequence as
> follows:
>
> Fix it by shutdown the timer work before cleanup in vudc_remove.
>
> Note that removing a driver is a root-only operation, and should never
> happen. But the attacker can directly unplug the usb to trigger the remove
> function.
>
> CPU0 CPU1
>
> |v_timer
> vudc_remove |
> kfree(udc); |
> //free shost |
> |udc->gadget
> |//use
>
> The udc might be removed before v_timer finished, and UAF happens.
>
> This bug was found by Codeql static analysis and might by false positive.
This statement that this could be a false positive makes me hesitate
taking this patch.
What kind of testing have you done with this fix? Were you able to test
the scenario of unplugging usb?
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists