[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHVum0fw2RXfqLNMbAFHbwh1P-O0JjnDCUTco9zt18mBi4Pk-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:51:25 -0700
From: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, bgardon@...gle.com, dmatlack@...gle.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 0/7] Optimize clear dirty log
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 3:57 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> > This patch series has optimized control flow of clearing dirty log and
> > improved its performance by ~40% (2% more than v2).
> >
> > It also got rid of many variants of the handle_changed_spte family of
> > functions and converged logic to one handle_changed_spte() function. It
> > also remove tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_[acc_track|dirty_log] and various
> > booleans for controlling them.
> >
> > v3:
> > - Tried to do better job at writing commit messages.
>
> LOL, that's the spirit!
>
> Did a cursory glance, looks good. I'll do a more thorough pass next week and get
> it queued up if all goes well. No need for a v4 at this point, I'll fixup David's
> various nits when applying. I'll also add a link in patch 2 to the discussion
Yeah, he is too demanding! :p
> about why we determined that bypassing __tdp_mmu_set_spte() is safe; that's critical
> information that isn't captured in the changelog.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists