[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72cf6344a1c5942bff0872d05dce82b787b49b76.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 07:55:41 +0000
From: Nancy Lin (林欣螢) <Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>
To: "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Singo Chang (張興國)
<Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
"nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com"
<clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v29 1/7] dt-bindings: mediatek: add ethdr definition for
mt8195
On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 12:36 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/03/2023 10:53, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>
> > Hello Krzysztof, Nancy,
> >
> > Since this series has reached v29, can we please reach an agreement
> > on the bindings
> > to use here, so that we can get this finally upstreamed?
> >
> > I will put some examples to try to get this issue resolved.
> >
> > ### Example 1: Constrain the number of GCE entries to *seven* array
> > elements (7x4!)
> >
> > mediatek,gce-client-reg:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > maxItems: 1
> > description: The register of display function block to be set
> > by gce.
> > There are 4 arguments in this property, gce node, subsys id,
> > offset and
> > register size. The subsys id is defined in the gce header of
> > each chips
> > include/dt-bindings/gce/<chip>-gce.h, mapping to the
> > register of display
> > function block.
> > items:
> > minItems: 28
> > maxItems: 28
> > items: <----- this block doesn't seem to
> > get checked :\
> > - description: phandle of GCE
> > - description: GCE subsys id
> > - description: register offset
> > - description: register size
>
> This is what we would like to have but it requires exception in
> dtschema. Thus:
>
> >
> >
> > ### Example 2: Don't care about constraining the number of
> > arguments
> >
> > mediatek,gce-client-reg:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > maxItems: 1
> > description: The register of display function block to be set
> > by gce.
> > There are 4 arguments in this property, gce node, subsys id,
> > offset and
> > register size. The subsys id is defined in the gce header of
> > each chips
> > include/dt-bindings/gce/<chip>-gce.h, mapping to the
> > register of display
> > function block.
>
> use this.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, Angelo,
Thanks for the comment.
The Example 2 can pass dt_binding_check.
But the example in the binding has 7 items [1] and dts [2]. Does the
"maxItems: 1" affect any other schema or dts check?
[1]
+ mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c11XXXX 0x4000 0x1000>,
+ <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c11XXXX 0x5000 0x1000>,
+ <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c11XXXX 0x7000 0x1000>,
+ <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c11XXXX 0x9000 0x1000>,
+ <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c11XXXX 0xa000 0x1000>,
+ <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c11XXXX 0xb000 0x1000>,
+ <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c11XXXX 0xc000 0x1000>;
>
[2] [v21,25/25] arm64: dts: mt8195: add display node for vdosys1
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220504091440.2052-26-nancy.lin@mediatek.com/
Regards,
Nancy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists