linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Document SM61[12]5 GPU SMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:32:31 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Document SM61[12]5 GPU SMMU

On 16/03/2023 22:59, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16.03.2023 20:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15/03/2023 11:52, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> Both of these SoCs have a Qualcomm MMU500 implementation of SMMU
>>> in front of their GPUs that expect 3 clocks. Both of them also have
>>> an APPS SMMU that expects no clocks. Remove qcom,sm61[12]5-smmu-500
>>> from the "no clocks" list (intentionally 'breaking' the schema checks
>>> of APPS SMMU, as now it *can* accept clocks - with the current
>>> structure of this file it would have taken a wastefully-long time to
>>> sort this out properly..) and add necessary yaml to describe the
>>> clocks required by the GPU SMMUs.
>>
>>
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          items:
>>> +            - enum:
>>> +                - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500
>>> +                - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
>>> +            - const: qcom,adreno-smmu
>>> +            - const: qcom,smmu-500
>>> +            - const: arm,mmu-500
>>
>> If you drop the hunk later (from allOf:if), then what clocks do you
>> expect for non-GPU SMMU?
> Both 6115 and 6125 require no clocks under the APPS (non-GPU) SMMU.
> However, the list below uses a `contains:` which means I'd have
> to add a whole another hunk like
> 
> 	- items:
>             - enum:
>                 - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500
>                 - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
>             - const: qcom,smmu-500
>             - const: arm,mmu-500
> 
> and add another level of indentation to the previous one
> 
> I figured skipping that was less messy (I think we discussed this
> once as well), but if you prefer to keep it strict, I can.

Nah, ok, it's fine.

Best regards,
Krzysztof