lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:55:44 +0000
From:   andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
To:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 28/34] x86/fred: fixup fault on ERETU by jumping to
 fred_entrypoint_user

On 17/03/2023 9:39 am, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_FRED
>> +static bool ex_handler_eretu(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
>> +                            struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
>> +{
>> +       struct pt_regs *uregs = (struct pt_regs *)(regs->sp - offsetof(struct pt_regs, ip));
>> +       unsigned short ss = uregs->ss;
>> +       unsigned short cs = uregs->cs;
>> +
>> +       fred_info(uregs)->edata = fred_event_data(regs);
>> +       uregs->ssx = regs->ssx;
>> +       uregs->ss = ss;
>> +       uregs->csx = regs->csx;
>> +       uregs->current_stack_level = 0;
>> +       uregs->cs = cs;
> Hello
>
> If the ERETU instruction had tried to return from NMI to ring3 and just faulted,
> is NMI still blocked?
>
> We know that IRET unconditionally enables NMI, but I can't find any clue in the
> FRED's manual.
>
> In the pseudocode of ERETU in the manual, it seems that NMI is only enabled when
> ERETU succeeds with bit28 in csx set.  If so, this code will fail to reenable
> NMI if bit28 is not explicitly re-set in csx.

IRET clearing NMI blocking is the source of an immense amount of grief,
and ultimately the reason why Linux and others can't use supervisor
shadow stacks at the moment.

Changing this property, so NMIs only get unblocked on successful
execution of an ERET{S,U}, was a key demand of the FRED spec.

i.e. until you have successfully ERET*'d, you're still logically in the
NMI handler and NMIs need to remain blocked even when handling the #GP
from a bad ERET.

~Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ