linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] cgroup/cpuset: Find another usable CPU if none found in current cpuset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230317122708.ax3m2d4zijkfdzjq@blackpad>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 13:27:08 +0100
From:   Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] cgroup/cpuset: Find another usable CPU if none found
 in current cpuset

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 04:22:06PM -0400, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> Some arm64 systems can have asymmetric CPUs where certain tasks are only
> runnable on a selected subset of CPUs.

Ah, I'm catching up.

> This information is not captured in the cpuset. As a result,
> task_cpu_possible_mask() may return a mask that have no overlap with
> effective_cpus causing new_cpus to become empty.

I can see that historically, there was an approach of terminating
unaccomodable tasks:
   94f9c00f6460 ("arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores") 
the removal of killing had been made possible with
   df950811f4a8 ("arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system").

That gives two other alternatives to affinity modification:
2) kill such tasks (not unlike OOM upon memory.max reduction),
3) reject cpuset reduction (violates cgroup v2 delegation).

What do you think about 2)?

Michal

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)