linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/27] 4.19.278-rc3 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZBRjTid0Hc4V7bwB@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 13:55:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/27] 4.19.278-rc3 review

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 10:23:42AM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:42:14AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.278 release.
> > There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 09:41:20 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230311):
> mips: 63 configs -> no  failure
> arm: 115 configs -> no failure
> arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
> x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
> alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
> powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
> riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
> s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
> xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
> 
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
> 
> Boot Regression on test laptop:
> Only black screen but ssh worked, so from the dmesg it seems i915 failed.

Can you bisect this?