[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBR1PWRY7ql7VIth@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:12:13 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@...el.com>,
Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
Vitaly Lubart <vitaly.lubart@...el.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mei: Move uuid.h to the MEI namespace
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 03:07:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 07:07:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > There is only a single user of the UUID uAPI, let's make it
> > part of that user.
> >
> > The way it's done is to prevent compilation time breakage for
> > the user space that does
> >
> > #include <linux/uuid.h>
> >
> > In the future MEI user space tools can switch over to use mei_uuid.h.
>
> When will that happen?
I don't know
> And why the churn, what's the problem with keeping this as uuid.h?
The problem here is a possible confusion with uAPI and internal headers with
the same name.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists