[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBSCObGmIXjyeMA6@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 15:07:37 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Luis Machado <luis.machado@....com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] arm64: mops: document boot requirements for MOPS
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 04:00:06PM +0000, Kristina Martsenko wrote:
> + For CPUs with Memory Copy and Memory Set instructions (FEAT_MOPS):
> +
> + - If the kernel is entered at EL1 and EL2 is present:
> +
> + - HCRX_EL2.MSCEn (bit 11) must be initialised to 0b1.
> +
> + - HCRX_EL2.MCE2 (bit 10) must be initialised to 0b0.
Regarding MCE2, does EL1 actually care if EL2 wants to handle all the
memcpy/memset exceptions? There may even be a valid case to do this at
EL2 if you run a guest that uses these instructions but has no clue on
how to deal with the specific exception like WrongOption.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists