linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: sunhme: Inline error returns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:49:14 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: sunhme: Inline error returns

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:36:25AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 3/15/23 03:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 20:36:12 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote:
> > > Fixes: 96c6e9faecf1 ("sunhme: forward the error code from pci_enable_device()")
> > 
> > No such	commit in our trees :(
> 
> Ah, looks like I forgot this was bad when copying the other commit. It should be acb3f35f920b.

I agree that is the correct commit.
And the code changes look good to me.

But I wonder if the fix should be separated into another patch,
separate from the cleanup.