linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/15] Introduce Nuvoton ma35d1 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f21df56b-43b8-a48e-ab8f-e0cf2b163976@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:07:07 +0800
From:   Jacky Huang <ychuang570808@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        schung@...oton.com, Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Introduce Nuvoton ma35d1 SoC


On 2023/3/18 上午 12:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/03/2023 14:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I only now saw that you had already submitted this several times
>> at the beginning of last year, and this is technically 'v5'
>> of the series, and it would make sense to add 'v6' to the subject
>> next time and link back to the previous [1] and this[2] submission
>> on lore.kernel.org.
> ... and address previous feedback. Or at least make it clear in
> changelog that you addressed it, so our review was not ignored.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Dear Krzysztof,


Thank you.

Of course, I will add back the changelog.

And, I have a question. If subsequent modifications made to a patch, 
should the

"Reviewed-by" still be valid? Can we keep it?

Best regards,

Jacky Huang