linux-kernel - Re: Outreachy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b5a65ee5-5ae9-9f2e-16f9-906d64c4ac66@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:20:15 +0200
From:   Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@...il.com>
To:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc:     Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Outreachy Linux Kernel <outreachy@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Outreachy


On ١٥‏/٣‏/٢٠٢٣ ٢٢:٠٩, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 3/15/23 12:24, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> On 3/15/23 07:03, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 03:17:28PM +0200, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>>>> Hi Mentors,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am Menna, Outreachy applicant and I work on my clean-up patches.
>>>>
>>>> Is it Okay to work on this error reported by checkpatch script?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.c
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> ERROR: Use 4 digit octal (0777) not decimal permissions
>>>> #256: FILE: drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.c:256:
>>>> +static IIO_DEV_ATTR_FREQ(0, 1, 0200, NULL, ad9832_write, 
>>>> AD9832_FREQ1HM);
>>> What???  Is it complaining about the 0200?  That is octal. Why is
>>> checkpatch complaining about this?  Am I wrong?  Maybe I am misreading.
>>>
>>> I could investigate, but I am leaving that task to you.  It may be that
>>> checkpatch has a problem and you can fix that instead.
>>>
>> Yes, checkpatch seems to be confused here.
> It seems to make an assumption that everything starting with 
> IIO_DEV_ATTR_ has the mode field at the same position. Which is not 
> the case.
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/scripts/checkpatch.pl#L798
>
> Still a good target to get this fixed as part of a outreachy task.


I see, Thanks Randy and Lars-Peter for your help I will try check this.