[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13e49e62-6e01-b736-e0c4-379a82299ddb@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 12:35:29 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
jonas.gorski@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, olteanv@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: net: move bcm6368-mdio-mux bindings to
b53
On 17/03/2023 12:34, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> b53 MMAP devices have a MDIO Mux bus controller that must be registered after
> properly initializing the switch. If the MDIO Mux controller is registered
> from a separate driver and the device has an external switch present, it will
> cause a race condition which will hang the device.
Are you sure it is wrapped according to Linux coding style?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L586
Your rationale does not justify incompatible binding change, especially
that it could be probably solved by including the child in the parent.
Anyway, Linux driver boot order is not a reason to change bindings really.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists