lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 19 Mar 2023 18:15:55 +0200
From:   Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@...il.com>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
        johan@...nel.org, elder@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: remove unnecessary blank line


On ١٩‏/٣‏/٢٠٢٣ ١٨:٠٩, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
>
> On domenica 19 marzo 2023 16:29:09 CET Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>
> > Remove unnecessary blank line before struct as reported
>
> > by checkpatch:
>
> >
>
> > " CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines "
>
> >
>
> > Signed-off-by: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@...il.com>
>
> > ---
>
> > drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 1 -
>
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> >
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c 
> b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
>
> > index 3fda172239d2..26d39e08c3b6 100644
>
> > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
>
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
>
> > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ struct gb_pwm_chip {
>
> > #define pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(chip) \
>
> >     container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip)
>
> >
>
> > -
>
> > static int gb_pwm_count_operation(struct gb_pwm_chip *pwmc)
>
> > {
>
> >     struct gb_pwm_count_response response;
>
> > --
>
> > 2.34.1
>
>
> Hi Menna,
>
>
Hi Fabio,


> I just saw that today you sent this patch at least three times:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319114155.42148-2-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com/
>

This for different file, and the below I sent it with other patch so I 
resend it again.

>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319152909.163598-1-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com/
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319132452.151877-2-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com/
>
>
> Why are you doing so?
>

sorry for this.

>
> Please send your patches only once and wait at least a week without 
> any replies before resending. Furthermore, when resending, please 
> explain under the three dashes ("---") why you are doing so. Patches 
> may get lost, but this is not your case for sending them again and 
> again in a single day.
>
got your point.

>
> Is there anything I'm missing?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Fabio
>
>
>

Thanks,

Menna

Powered by blists - more mailing lists