[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f698f49-135a-4263-8471-96f406919cb1@spud>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 20:35:47 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Deduplicating RISCV cmpxchg.h macros
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 05:00:54AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> While studying riscv's cmpxchg.h file, I got really interested in
> understanding how RISCV asm implemented the different versions of
> {cmp,}xchg.
>
> When I understood the pattern, it made sense for me to remove the
> duplications and create macros to make it easier to understand what exactly
> changes between the versions: Instruction sufixes & barriers.
>
> I split those changes in 3 levels for each cmpxchg and xchg, resulting a
> total of 6 patches. I did this so it becomes easier to review and remove
> the last levels if desired, but I have no issue squashing them if it's
> better.
>
> Please provide comments.
>
> Thanks!
> Leo
>
> Leonardo Bras (6):
> riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate cmpxchg() asm functions
> riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate cmpxchg() macros
> riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate arch_cmpxchg() macros
> riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate xchg() asm functions
FWIW, this patch seems to break the build pretty badly:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20230318080059.1109286-5-leobras@redhat.com/
Patches 1 & 5 also add quite a lot of sparse issues (like 1000), but I
think that may be more of an artifact of the testing process as opposed
to something caused by this patchset.
Cheers,
Conor.
> riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate xchg() macros
> riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate arch_xchg() macros
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists