linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 20/23] soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Use GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230320144356.803762-21-robdclark@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 07:43:42 -0700
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2 20/23] soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Use GFP_ATOMIC in write path

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>

Preparing for better lockdep annotations for things that happen in runpm
suspend/resume path vs shrinker/reclaim in the following patches, we
need to avoid allocations that can trigger reclaim in the icc_set_bw()
path.  In the RPMh case, rpmh_write_batch() already uses GFP_ATOMIC, so
it should be reasonable to use in the smd-rpm case as well.

Alternatively, 256bytes is small enough for a function that isn't called
recursively to allocate on-stack.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
index 7e3b6a7ea34c..478da981d9fb 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ int qcom_rpm_smd_write(struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm,
 	if (WARN_ON(size >= 256))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	pkt = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	pkt = kmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!pkt)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.39.2