linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/mm: Smoke test UFFD_FEATURE_WP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 16:01:39 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
        Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/mm: Smoke test
 UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED

On 20.03.23 15:43, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:25:43AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 09.03.23 23:37, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> Enable it by default on the stress test, and add some smoke tests for the
>>> pte markers on anonymous.
>>
>> Would it make sense to make kernel support optional and test both paths --
>> once with the feature enabled (if available on the kernel we're testing) and
>> once with the feature disabled?
> 
> Yeah, I think the current uffd selftest is not friendly to old kernels so I
> made it simple - IOW the test should fail already on old kernels AFAIK.
> Maybe I can prepare some patches this week or next to cleanup some parts of
> it.

Some people to tend to run upstream selftests on older kernels, but I 
guess this is not high priority. Can always be added on top.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb