[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <460b50d3-579c-5dfa-7c1b-531cc9b1c2d5@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 16:01:39 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/mm: Smoke test
UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED
On 20.03.23 15:43, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:25:43AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 09.03.23 23:37, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> Enable it by default on the stress test, and add some smoke tests for the
>>> pte markers on anonymous.
>>
>> Would it make sense to make kernel support optional and test both paths --
>> once with the feature enabled (if available on the kernel we're testing) and
>> once with the feature disabled?
>
> Yeah, I think the current uffd selftest is not friendly to old kernels so I
> made it simple - IOW the test should fail already on old kernels AFAIK.
> Maybe I can prepare some patches this week or next to cleanup some parts of
> it.
Some people to tend to run upstream selftests on older kernels, but I
guess this is not high priority. Can always be added on top.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists