[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230320165233.GS2194297@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:52:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 23/34] x86/fred: update MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0 during task
switch
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 06:39:35PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@...or.com>
>
> MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0 is used during ring 3 event delivery, and needs to
> be updated to point to the top of next task stack during task switch.
>
> Update MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0 with WRMSR instruction for now, and will use
> WRMSRNS/WRMSRLIST for performance once it gets upstreamed.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@...or.com>
> Tested-by: Shan Kang <shan.kang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h
> index 5c91305d09d2..00fd85abc1d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h
> @@ -68,9 +68,16 @@ static inline void update_task_stack(struct task_struct *task)
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> this_cpu_write(cpu_tss_rw.x86_tss.sp1, task->thread.sp0);
> #else
> - /* Xen PV enters the kernel on the thread stack. */
> - if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XENPV))
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED)) {
> + /*
> + * Will use WRMSRNS/WRMSRLIST for performance once it's upstreamed.
> + */
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0,
> + task_top_of_stack(task) + TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING);
> + } else if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XENPV)) {
Whee, so hardware will really only ever look at this when RSP0? I don't
need to worry about exceptions during context switch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists