linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] phy: phy-ocelot-serdes: add ability to be used in a non-syscon configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:00:04 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] phy: phy-ocelot-serdes: add ability to
 be used in a non-syscon configuration

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 04:41:36PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 01:34:31PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Once again netdev seems to have applied patches from other subsystems
> > > without review/ack.  What makes netdev different to any other kernel
> > > subsystem?  What would happen if other random maintainers started
> > > applying netdev patches without appropriate review?  I suspect someone
> > > would become understandably grumpy.
> >
> > Why again are you addressing your whinge to me? I'm not one of the
> > netdev maintainers, but I've pointed out what happens in netdev
> > land. However, you seem to *not* want to discuss it directly with
> > DaveM/Jakub/Paolo - as illustrated again with yet another response
> > to *me* rather than addressing your concerns *to* the people who
> > you have an issue with.
> >
> > This is not communication. Effectively, this is sniping, because
> > rather than discussing it with the individuals concerned, you are
> > instead preferring to discuss it with others.
> >
> > Please stop this.
> 
> Read the above paragraph again.

You sent your email _TO_ me, that means you addressed your comments
primarily _to_ me. RFC2822:

   The "To:" field contains the address(es) of the primary recipient(s)
   of the message.

   The "Cc:" field (where the "Cc" means "Carbon Copy" in the sense of
   making a copy on a typewriter using carbon paper) contains the
   addresses of others who are to receive the message, though the
   content of the message may not be directed at them.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!