linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device tree binding documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <507f79cf-acd8-5238-031a-fd71024e0c6a@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 19:15:22 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
        Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, john@...ozen.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device
 tree binding documentation

On 20/03/2023 19:09, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> Would mediatek,mtmips-clock.yaml make sense?
>>
>> More, except:
>> 1. This is not clock, but sysc.
> 
> Sergio, beware.

I meant, that's what I understood from what Sergio said. :)

> 
>> 2. mips sounds redundant. Do you have rt2xxx and mt7xxx chips which are ARM?
> 
> All of the SoCs, RTXXXX, MT7620, MT7621, MT7628, MT7688 are MIPS. So I 
> decided to call this platform MTMIPS as I've seen MediaTek use this on 
> other projects like U-Boot. This is what I did on my pinctrl patch 
> series as well.

Ah, but indeed there are newer Mediatek MT6xxx and MT8xxx SoCs which are
ARM, so mediatek,mtmips-sysc would work.

Best regards,
Krzysztof