linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] mips: ralink: remove clock related function prototypes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMhs-H-y6TsSoKsJzM0gkFk6wx7xNigXKJb7wm8rBzrigtJANg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 21:17:47 +0100
From:   Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, john@...ozen.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        mturquette@...libre.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, arinc.unal@...nc9.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mips: ralink: remove clock related function prototypes

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 8:38 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Sergio Paracuellos (2023-03-20 09:18:20)
> > Clock related code has been removed from 'arch/mips/ralink' folder and put
> > into drivers space. Hence remove clock related prototypes which are not
> > used anymore.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/mips/ralink/common.h | 3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/common.h b/arch/mips/ralink/common.h
> > index 87fc16751281..fcdfc9dc6210 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/ralink/common.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/common.h
> > @@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ extern struct ralink_soc_info soc_info;
> >
> >  extern void ralink_of_remap(void);
> >
> > -extern void ralink_clk_init(void);
>
> Why isn't this removed in the patch that removes the function?

Because the function exists for all the SoCs code and there are
several patches removing it; one per SoC, so I decided to remove this
at the end. Should I squash all patches together instead?

>
> > -extern void ralink_clk_add(const char *dev, unsigned long rate);
> > -
>
> Same comment.
>
> >  extern void ralink_rst_init(void);
> >

Best regards,
    Sergio Paracuellos