[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6418cbc98b225_2c274e29437@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:10:33 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@...il.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
CC: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<ac100@...ts.launchpad.net>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<outreachy@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: nvec: Change container_of macro to an inline
function.
Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 06:14:50PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Mar 2023, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > The macro has the drawback that one cannot determine
> > > what type it applies to by looking at the definition.
> > > Hence this macro definition is not type-safe.
> > >
> > > The inline function gives the same benefits as the
> > > macro and only accepts the specific type of arguments.
> > > Use static because the definition only requires it to be
> > > visible in the current file.
> >
> > Sumitra,
> >
> > The subject line and log message could be a little less generic. For the
> > subject line, one has the impression that you are changing the definition
> > of container_of itself.
> >
> > The log message is also a bit wordy. Something like the following would
> > be more concise and still present the issue:
> >
>
> Okay. I will focus more on writing better patch subject and description.
Sumitra,
I can't tell for sure via email if you are getting discouraged. But if you are
don't feel bad. Writing good commit messages is hard.
That said, I see a couple of build errors from 0day on this patch. Do use the
tools to correct things like that before submitting.
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists