[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230320212301.GD1434@sol.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:23:01 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@...sung.com>
Cc: agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once
on FEC
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:59:32PM +0900, Yeongjin Gil wrote:
> In verity_end_io(), if bi_status is not BLK_STS_OK, it can be return
> directly. But if FEC configured, it is desired to correct the data page
> through verity_verify_io. And the return value will be converted to
> blk_status and passed to verity_finish_io().
>
> BTW, when a bit is set in v->validated_blocks, verity_verify_io() skips
> verification regardless of I/O error for the corresponding bio. In this
> case, the I/O error could not be returned properly, and as a result,
> there is a problem that abnormal data could be read for the
> corresponding block.
>
> To fix this problem, when an I/O error occurs, do not skip verification
> even if the bit related is set in v->validated_blocks.
>
> Fixes: 843f38d382b1 ("dm verity: add 'check_at_most_once' option to only validate hashes once")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@...sung.com>
> ---
> v2:
> -change commit message and tag
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> index ade83ef3b439..9316399b920e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int verity_verify_io(struct dm_verity_io *io)
> sector_t cur_block = io->block + b;
> struct ahash_request *req = verity_io_hash_req(v, io);
>
> - if (v->validated_blocks &&
> + if (v->validated_blocks && bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK &&
> likely(test_bit(cur_block, v->validated_blocks))) {
> verity_bv_skip_block(v, io, iter);
> continue;
> --
Looks good now, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists