[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04bd0e13-d866-22f4-2b7a-200a31722a46@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:49:41 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
cc: lizhe <sensor1010@....com>, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] nubus: Remove redunant driver match function
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 07:01:33PM +0800, lizhe wrote:
>
> > u.kleline-koenig, please
> > delete the path you submitted, this patch does not belong to you
>
> Even if I'd agree, I couldn't. That's up to Finn (I think) to drop this
> patch again from his queue and then accept a similar patch from you.
I leave it up to Geert to apply Nubus patches that pass review. There is
no git tree for this subsystem and the only arch to make use of it so far
is m68k.
In my opinion, there's nothing novel about deleting code so it's quite
meaningless what "git log" says about authorship. That's doubly true for
redundant code, which compilers elide as a matter of course.
If some developers are receiving incentives to do juanitorial work (like
running coccinelle scripts) then I'd like to know whether a line added has
the same price as a line deleted.
Maybe some developers are deleting redundant code I wrote so as to make my
life easier as the maintainer. Maybe they are not getting paid for that.
I'm not aware of that having happened here, but if it did, thanks a lot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists