lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30200c4e-21e8-4454-a947-01d228f154a1@kili.mountain>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:44:48 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:     oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc:     lkp@...el.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Subject: fs/zonefs/file.c:441 zonefs_file_dio_append() error: uninitialized
 symbol 'size'.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   a3671bd86a9770e34969522d29bb30a1b66fd88a
commit: 4008e2a0b01aba982356fd15b128a47bf11bd9c7 zonefs: Reorganize code
config: nios2-randconfig-m031-20230319 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230319/202303191227.GL8Dprbi-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303191227.GL8Dprbi-lkp@intel.com/

New smatch warnings:
fs/zonefs/file.c:441 zonefs_file_dio_append() error: uninitialized symbol 'size'.

vim +/size +441 fs/zonefs/file.c

4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  378  static ssize_t zonefs_file_dio_append(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  379  {
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  380  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  381  	struct zonefs_inode_info *zi = ZONEFS_I(inode);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  382  	struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  383  	unsigned int max = bdev_max_zone_append_sectors(bdev);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  384  	struct bio *bio;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  385  	ssize_t size;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  386  	int nr_pages;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  387  	ssize_t ret;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  388  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  389  	max = ALIGN_DOWN(max << SECTOR_SHIFT, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  390  	iov_iter_truncate(from, max);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  391  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  392  	nr_pages = iov_iter_npages(from, BIO_MAX_VECS);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  393  	if (!nr_pages)
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  394  		return 0;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  395  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  396  	bio = bio_alloc(bdev, nr_pages,
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  397  			REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND | REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE, GFP_NOFS);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  398  	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = zi->i_zsector;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  399  	bio->bi_ioprio = iocb->ki_ioprio;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  400  	if (iocb_is_dsync(iocb))
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  401  		bio->bi_opf |= REQ_FUA;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  402  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  403  	ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, from);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  404  	if (unlikely(ret))
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  405  		goto out_release;

This is a false positive because bio_iov_iter_get_pages() is returning
negatives on this error path.  Building the cross function database
would silence this warning.  Still it's not just Smatch which is going
to complain and GCC extensions are most likely going to initialize size
to zero anyway.

4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  406  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  407  	size = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  408  	task_io_account_write(size);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  409  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  410  	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  411  		bio_set_polled(bio, iocb);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  412  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  413  	ret = submit_bio_wait(bio);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  414  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  415  	/*
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  416  	 * If the file zone was written underneath the file system, the zone
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  417  	 * write pointer may not be where we expect it to be, but the zone
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  418  	 * append write can still succeed. So check manually that we wrote where
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  419  	 * we intended to, that is, at zi->i_wpoffset.
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  420  	 */
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  421  	if (!ret) {
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  422  		sector_t wpsector =
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  423  			zi->i_zsector + (zi->i_wpoffset >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  424  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  425  		if (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector != wpsector) {
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  426  			zonefs_warn(inode->i_sb,
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  427  				"Corrupted write pointer %llu for zone at %llu\n",
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  428  				wpsector, zi->i_zsector);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  429  			ret = -EIO;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  430  		}
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  431  	}
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  432  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  433  	zonefs_file_write_dio_end_io(iocb, size, ret, 0);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  434  	trace_zonefs_file_dio_append(inode, size, ret);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  435  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  436  out_release:
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  437  	bio_release_pages(bio, false);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  438  	bio_put(bio);
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  439  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  440  	if (ret >= 0) {
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25 @441  		iocb->ki_pos += size;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  442  		return size;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  443  	}
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  444  
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  445  	return ret;
4008e2a0b01aba Damien Le Moal 2022-11-25  446  }

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ