linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx290: fix conditional function defintions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZBgoHvg3kxsVoSzg@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:32:14 +0200
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx290: fix conditional function defintions

Hello,

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >>
> >> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the
> >> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper
> >> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning:
> >>
> >> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> >> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>            ^
> >> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> >> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >>            ^
> >>
> 
> I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks
>  this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly
> reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is
> there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards
> mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus?

Mauro has recently pulled my PR including this and I understand it's in
Mauro's tree now.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus