lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <810afc81-57e3-17ea-c624-34a157602d1f@leemhuis.info> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:46:45 +0100 From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info> To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx290: fix conditional function defintions On 20.03.23 10:42, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 20.03.23 10:32, Sakari Ailus wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>> On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> >>>>> >>>>> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the >>>>> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper >>>>> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning: >>>>> >>>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>>> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>>> ^ >>>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>>> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>> ^ >>>>> >>> >>> I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks >>> this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly >>> reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is >>> there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards >>> mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus? >> >> Mauro has recently pulled my PR including this and I understand it's in >> Mauro's tree now. > > Ahh, great, many thx. > > I checked Linux-next before writing my mail, but didn't sport it there. :-/ Argh, ohh no, it's there. Sorry for the noise. Second time something like this happens today. Seems today is not my best day. :-/ Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists