linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: use inline function for macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3c9e2fd0-fec8-2aa7-0e68-601b13cc86dd@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:14:54 +0200
From:   Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@...il.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
        johan@...nel.org, elder@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: use inline function for macros


On ٢٠‏/٣‏/٢٠٢٣ ٠٨:٠٠, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> and version that I have submitted, should I do anything about it as you
>>>> said
>>>> it is wrong solution?
>>> My concern was the blank line after each of the structure definitions,
>>> which is not in Greg's tree, so he can't apply the patch.  Other than
>>> that, if the code compiles it is at least going in the right direction.
>>>
>>> Please fix the newlines issue, and then send the patch again.
>>>
>>> julia
>>
>> Okay I will fix it, but will send it as a new patch not v3, right?
> Why as a new patch?  The change is the same as in v2, and sending v3 makes
> it clear that v2 should be ignored.
>
> julia


Okay, thanks.

Menna