lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a461e44-7d24-5b5d-db04-e7fa85beeaa7@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:30:20 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] mm/cma: move init_cma_reserved_pages() to cma.c and
 make it static

On 19.03.23 22:59, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> 
> init_cma_reserved_pages() only used in cma.c, no point of having it in
> page_alloc.c.
> 
> Move init_cma_reserved_pages() to cma.c and make it static.

I guess the motivation is to avoid letting too many subsystems mess with 
pageblock migratetypes, managed pages, PG_reserved ...

So it kind of makes sense to have these low-level details out of common 
CMA code, no?

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ