linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] mm: Introduce memblock_isolate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <efe1ef6b-b1c2-8d5b-82b7-3cd64053643e@ghiti.fr>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:54:14 +0100
From:   Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] mm: Introduce memblock_isolate_memory

Hi Mike,

On 3/16/23 21:12, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:17:09PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>> This function allows to split a region in memblock.memory and will be
>> useful when setting up the linear mapping with STRICT_KERNEL_RWX: it
>> allows to isolate the kernel text/rodata and then avoid to map those
>> regions with a PUD/P4D/PGD.
>   
> Sorry I've missed it last time. The changelog is fine in the context of


No worries :)


> this series, but if you look at it as a part of memblock changelog it
> doesn't provide enough background on why memblock_isolate_memory() is
> useful.
>
> Can you please add more context so it would be self explanatory?


What about: "memblock.memory contains the list of memory regions and a 
memory region can cover memory that will be mapped with different 
permissions. So to ease the mapping process, allow to isolate those 
regions by introducing a new function called memblock_isolate_memory. 
This will be used in arch specific code to isolate the kernel 
text/rodata regions when STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is enabled so that we avoid 
mapping them with PUD/P4D/PGD mappings."

Thanks,

Alex


>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
>> Tested-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +
>>   mm/memblock.c            | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
>> index 50ad19662a32..2f7ef97c0da7 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
>> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ int memblock_clear_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>>   int memblock_mark_mirror(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>>   int memblock_mark_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>>   int memblock_clear_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>> +int memblock_isolate_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>>   
>>   void memblock_free_all(void);
>>   void memblock_free(void *ptr, size_t size);
>> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
>> index 25fd0626a9e7..e8c651a37012 100644
>> --- a/mm/memblock.c
>> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
>> @@ -805,6 +805,26 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * memblock_isolate_memory - isolate given range in memblock.memory
>> + * @base: base of range to isolate
>> + * @size: size of range to isolate
>> + *
>> + * Isolates the given range in memblock.memory so that it does not share any
>> + * region with other ranges.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * 0 on success, -errno on failure.
>> + */
>> +
>> +int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>> +{
>> +	int start_rgn, end_rgn;
>> +
>> +	return memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, base, size,
>> +				      &start_rgn, &end_rgn);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int __init_memblock memblock_remove_range(struct memblock_type *type,
>>   					  phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>>   {
>> -- 
>> 2.37.2
>>