linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: invalidate cache on polling ECC bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230320115558.49c5a062@xps-13>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:55:58 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>,
        Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
        <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: invalidate cache on polling
 ECC bit

Hi Dmitry,

ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:43:14 +0300:

> Hello guys!
> 
> Was it applied to some nand 'prepare-for-merge' release branch?

Not yet, I'll apply it this week in mtd/fixes, you'll be noticed.

Thanks,
Miquèl

> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:23:12PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > On 13/03/2023 12:18, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> > > Hi Arseniy,
> > > 
> > > avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2023 10:36:11 +0300:
> > >   
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > we reproduced this problem on one of our boards. It triggers very rare
> > > > when 'usleep_range()' is present, but when sleeping is removed - it fires
> > > > always. I suppose problem is with caching, as 'info_buf' memory is mapped by
> > > > 'dma_map_single()'.  
> > > 
> > > The fix looks really legitimate, indeed I get that the usleep_range()
> > > might make it work most of the time but not always. Having this bit in
> > > a DMA buf area is a bit strange. Well, the fix LGTM anyway.  
> > 
> > Yep it looks legitimate!
> > 
> > LGTM
> > 
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
> >   
> > >   
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks, Arseniy
> > > > 
> > > > On 13.03.2023 10:32, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:  
> > > > > 'info_buf' memory is cached and driver polls ECC bit in it. This bit
> > > > > is set by the NAND controller. If 'usleep_range()' returns before device
> > > > > sets this bit, 'info_buf' will be cached and driver won't see update of
> > > > > this bit and will loop forever.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: 8fae856c5350 ("mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > > >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> > > > > index 5ee01231ac4c..2c05c08a0eaf 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> > > > > @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ struct meson_nfc {
> > > > >   	dma_addr_t daddr;
> > > > >   	dma_addr_t iaddr;
> > > > > +	u32 info_bytes;
> > > > >   	unsigned long assigned_cs;
> > > > >   };
> > > > > @@ -503,6 +504,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_dma_buffer_setup(struct nand_chip *nand, void *databuf,
> > > > >   					 nfc->daddr, datalen, dir);
> > > > >   			return ret;
> > > > >   		}
> > > > > +		nfc->info_bytes = infolen;
> > > > >   		cmd = GENCMDIADDRL(NFC_CMD_AIL, nfc->iaddr);
> > > > >   		writel(cmd, nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
> > > > > @@ -520,8 +522,10 @@ static void meson_nfc_dma_buffer_release(struct nand_chip *nand,
> > > > >   	struct meson_nfc *nfc = nand_get_controller_data(nand);
> > > > >   	dma_unmap_single(nfc->dev, nfc->daddr, datalen, dir);
> > > > > -	if (infolen)
> > > > > +	if (infolen) {
> > > > >   		dma_unmap_single(nfc->dev, nfc->iaddr, infolen, dir);
> > > > > +		nfc->info_bytes = 0;
> > > > > +	}
> > > > >   }
> > > > >   static int meson_nfc_read_buf(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *buf, int len)
> > > > > @@ -710,6 +714,8 @@ static void meson_nfc_check_ecc_pages_valid(struct meson_nfc *nfc,
> > > > >   		usleep_range(10, 15);
> > > > >   		/* info is updated by nfc dma engine*/
> > > > >   		smp_rmb();
> > > > > +		dma_sync_single_for_cpu(nfc->dev, nfc->iaddr, nfc->info_bytes,
> > > > > +					DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > > > >   		ret = *info & ECC_COMPLETE;
> > > > >   	} while (!ret);
> > > > >   }  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Miquèl  
> >   
>