[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBg+3pGG9v+hQFYI@uudg.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:10:04 -0300
From: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
To: linux@...ffen.cc
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@...khoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.10-rt] kernel: fork: set wake_q_sleeper.next=NULL
again in dup_task_struct
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:03:47AM +0100, linux@...ffen.cc wrote:
> From: Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@...khoff.com>
>
> Without this we get system hangs within a couple of days.
> It's also reproducible in minutes with "stress-ng --exec 20".
>
> Example error in dmesg:
> INFO: task stress-ng:163916 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Not tainted 5.10.168-rt83 #2
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> task:stress-ng state:D stack: 0 pid:163916 ppid: 72833 flags:0x00004000
> Call Trace:
> __schedule+0x2bd/0x940
> preempt_schedule_lock+0x23/0x50
> rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked+0x117/0x2c0
> rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x51/0x80
> rt_write_lock+0x1e/0x1c0
> do_exit+0x3ac/0xb20
> do_group_exit+0x39/0xb0
> get_signal+0x145/0x960
> ? wake_up_new_task+0x21f/0x3c0
> arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xf1/0x830
> ? __x64_sys_futex+0x146/0x1d0
> exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x116/0x1a0
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x28/0x190
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
> RIP: 0033:0x7f738d9074a7
> RSP: 002b:00007ffdafda3cb0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
> RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00000000000000ca RCX: 00007f738d9074a7
> RDX: 0000000000028051 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00007f738be949d0
> RBP: 00007ffdafda3d88 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f738be94700
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000028051
> R13: 00007f738be949d0 R14: 00007ffdafda51e0 R15: 00007f738be94700
>
> Fixes: 1ba44dcf789d ("Merge tag 'v5.10.162' into v5.10-rt")
Thank you for spotting and investigating that!
I dropped that specific line while fixing a small merge conflict from
788d0824269b io_uring: import 5.15-stable io_uring
Interestingly enough, I didn't see that problem while running stress-ng.
I may need to add a few more, different, systems to my test base.
Anyway, I will add this fix to the next build.
Luis
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@...khoff.com>
> ---
> kernel/fork.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index c6e0d555fca9..0c4c20eb762c 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -949,6 +949,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
> tsk->splice_pipe = NULL;
> tsk->task_frag.page = NULL;
> tsk->wake_q.next = NULL;
> + tsk->wake_q_sleeper.next = NULL;
> tsk->pf_io_worker = NULL;
>
> account_kernel_stack(tsk, 1);
> --
> 2.40.0
>
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists