[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBhVOziLz6WL6vv7@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:44:43 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] regmap-irq: Drop map from handle_mask_sync()
parameters
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 05:02:00PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> Changes in v2:
> - Pull out 104-dio-48e refactor to a precursor patch
>
> Remove the map parameter from the struct regmap_irq_chip callback
> handle_mask_sync() because it can be passed via the irq_drv_data
> parameter instead. The gpio-104-dio-48e driver is the only consumer of
> this callback and is thus updated accordingly.
>
> A couple pending patchsets also utilize handle_mask_sync() [0][1], so
> it'll be useful to merge the changes in this series first to avoid
> subsequent noise adjusting the dependent drivers.
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1677515341.git.william.gray@linaro.org/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1678106722.git.william.gray@linaro.org/
Good idea and intention, but something went wrong with bisectability as pointed
out by the build bot. As a last resort you would need to squash these two, but
try first another possible patch series split.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists