linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 2/3] drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi: revise the comment of intel_vsec_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46283dac-bd52-b171-d0b1-cc06e9c4d4e0@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:40:11 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Cc:     platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 2/3] drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi: revise
 the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux

Hi,

On 3/20/23 11:57, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> 
> On 2023/3/20 18:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/9/23 05:01, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>>> intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed including res and
>>> feature_vsec_dev memory.
>>>
>>> Fix this by revising the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux since res variable
>>> will also be freed in the intel_vsec_add_aux.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>
>> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
>> branch:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
>>
>> Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
>> local branch there, which might take a while.
>>
>> Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
>> added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
>> will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
>> merge-window.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
> 
> Thanks, Hans.
> 
> Shall I send the patch related to memory leak to the mainline? The mainline is also prone to this issue?

There is no need for this, I have just moved these from my review-hans branch to the fixes
branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=fixes

So these will be included in my next fixes pull-req for mainline.

Regards,

Hans




>>> ---
>>>   drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>>> index 882fe5e4763f..036d0e0dba19 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>>> @@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
>>>       /*
>>>        * intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed, no explicit
>>>        * delete is required on error or on module unload.
>>> -     * feature_vsec_dev memory is also freed as part of device
>>> -     * delete.
>>> +     * feature_vsec_dev and res memory are also freed as part of
>>> +     * device deletion.
>>>        */
>>>       return intel_vsec_add_aux(vsec_dev->pcidev, &vsec_dev->auxdev.dev,
>>>                     feature_vsec_dev, feature_id_name);
>